Write a Review

The Favourite movie reviews

• 2

  The Favourite

  Monday, December 31, 2018 6:58:45 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  Did not like at all. Waste of time and $. Nothing to do with history.... people were leaving during the movie.

• 10

  The Favourite

  Sunday, December 30, 2018 7:32:39 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Women behaving badly. Rich powerful women behaving as badly as rich powerful men. Very well acted, compelling until the very end. Oscar nomination for someone ... the director or the editor I hope.

• 1

  The Favourite

  Saturday, December 29, 2018 5:47:15 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Boring, lesbian Queen. Totally a waste of time/money.

• 6

  The Favourite

  Saturday, December 29, 2018 12:22:00 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  I wish the trailer for the movie hadn't shown only the humorous scenes; it was misleading as to the actual content of the movie. I do believe the movie to be historically accurate, but so what? If the story isn't cohesive and doesn't keep me wanting more, I'd just as soon read a good book on the period. Still, the acting was brilliant and the costumes and sets superb. Thank goodness we've moved beyond horse-drawn carriages for travel.

• 3

  The Favourite

  Friday, December 28, 2018 2:13:25 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Problem with this film is too many people today are not interested in truth and historic attention to this time period but various myth-making and psychological themes to take creative license to absurd levels. The most moronic reviews I have read are from people with a agenda who insist historical inaccuracies no longer matter and we have somehow evolved past taking such petty attention to the idea of truth and historic fact when they have determined these things do not actually exist. Save your money-this is anything but an accurate depiction of the 17th century as Titanic was of life in 1912.

• 9

  The Favourite

  Thursday, December 27, 2018 7:53:14 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  I liked this period film and found it to get me interested in history.

• 10

  The Favourite

  Thursday, December 27, 2018 5:20:46 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Brilliant and scathing. Great performances from the three leads, all at the top of their game. Loved the final scene which shows what blind ambition will get you in the end. Fantastic!

• 9

  The Favourite

  Thursday, December 27, 2018 1:11:23 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Such a surprise. These actresses, Olivia Colman, Rachel Weisz, and Emma Stone, all deserve an award. He screenplay delightful and so original. More films should be made with strong versitle actresses. Brillante Bravo!

• 10

  The Favourite

  Thursday, December 27, 2018 12:20:12 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  First, let me say this. Most of the reviews below are useless especially the ones that dismiss the film for historical inaccuracies, graphic sex scenes, or vile discourse. First of all, the director, Yorgos Lanthimos did not try to make the film an totally accurate historical film. However, most of the events and actions in this film are based on thoroughly researched documents. Were there lesbianic relationships among the three female characters? Let's put it this way. Queen Anne spent a considerable amount of private time with both of the younger women in her bed chambers and did eventually dismiss Lady Churchill ( Rachel Weisz) for her manipulative efforts to have Abigail ( Emma Stone) removed from the royal residence. This is amply documented in many historical accounts. Now, did Abigail actually poison Lady Churchill with the intent to kill her? Probably not, but the director decided to add this bit of drama to create some action and plot expanding drama. However, most of the political drama and scenes in the film are well documented in historical documents with the exception of the modern dance routine ( a la Michael Jackson ) between Lady Churchill and Masham (Joe Alwyn). The director used this scene to add unexpected and contemporary humor to the film. I'll get to the point. This film is a bawdy, rowdy and satirical take on the Royal Court and the reign of Queen Ann in the late 17th and early 18th century. While most of the historical elements are factual, this film is a trimphant example of satirical, cinematic entertainment and not a boring history lesson. If you want to read a truly well written review of this film, go read Peter Travers' review at rollingstone.com.

• 3

  The Favourite

  Thursday, December 27, 2018 9:59:58 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  Plot was uneven. One did not have empathy for any character. Throwing tomatoes at a naked man was out of context. Male leads were insignificant.